CAT 320 vs Komatsu PC200 vs Hitachi ZX210 in Khobar | Excavator Comparison 2025

cat-320-vs-komatsu-pc200-vs-hitachi-zx210-khobar
CAT 320 vs Komatsu PC200 vs Hitachi ZX210 in Khobar | Excavator Comparison 2025
Compare CAT 320, Komatsu PC200 & Hitachi ZX210 excavators in Khobar 2025. Find out which model fits oil, port, logistics & housing projects best in Saudi Arabia.

CAT 320 vs Komatsu PC200 vs Hitachi ZX210 in Khobar | Excavator Comparison 2025

The Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia — led by Khobar, Dammam, and Jubail — continues to dominate national infrastructure growth in 2025.
From Aramco oil expansions and King Abdulaziz Port upgrades to housing, roads, and logistics centers, contractors in Khobar rely heavily on three proven mid-size excavators: CAT 320, Komatsu PC200, and Hitachi ZX210.

This professional comparison breaks down how each machine performs in power, fuel economy, maintenance, resale value, and operating cost — helping buyers and site managers choose the best fit for their projects.

Why These Models Lead in Khobar’s Excavator Market

Proven durability under high-heat and sandy terrain.
Backed by strong dealer networks (Zahid Tractor, Komatsu Saudi, Hitachi Machinery).
Balanced specs for urban, port, and heavy industrial operations.
Widely available in certified-used and new condition across Saudi Arabia.

💡 CAT leads in performance, Komatsu in cost efficiency, and Hitachi in control precision.

CAT 320 vs Komatsu PC200 vs Hitachi ZX210 in Khobar

Technical Comparison Table (Khobar 2025)

Model	Operating Weight	Engine Power (hp)	Bucket Capacity	Fuel Use (L/h)	Ideal Application
CAT 320	21.0 t	162 hp	1.0 m³	12–18	Oil & port projects
Komatsu PC200	20.0 t	148 hp	0.9 m³	11–16	Roads & civil works
Hitachi ZX210	21.2 t	158 hp	1.0 m³	11–17	Logistics & city builds

💡 All three deliver near-identical performance classes — your decision depends on cost, application, and uptime priorities.

CAT 320 — Maximum Power and Resale Strength

Highlights CAT 320 vs Komatsu PC200 vs Hitachi ZX210 in Khobar

Robust 162 hp engine ideal for deep excavation and port loading.
Cat® Grade Control 3D for unmatched precision in industrial zones.
Industry-leading resale value across the GCC.
Smart Mode technology reduces fuel consumption by 15%.

Ideal Use CAT 320 vs Komatsu PC200 vs Hitachi ZX210 in Khobar

Oil, infrastructure, port dredging, and large-scale construction sites around Khobar and Jubail.

💡 CAT 320 is the machine of choice for contractors handling long-duration, high-demand projects.

Komatsu PC200 — Efficiency for Civil and Housing Works

Highlights CAT 320 vs Komatsu PC200 vs Hitachi ZX210 in Khobar

Legendary for fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs.
Easy to service with readily available parts in Saudi Arabia.
Compact frame ideal for urban and residential projects.
Consumes 10–15% less fuel than comparable models.

Ideal Use CAT 320 vs Komatsu PC200 vs Hitachi ZX210 in Khobar

Housing, road construction, and mid-scale logistics projects.

💡 Komatsu PC200 offers the best value for contractors focused on cost control and uptime.

Hitachi ZX210 — Precision and Comfort

Highlights CAT 320 vs Komatsu PC200 vs Hitachi ZX210 in Khobar

High hydraulic responsiveness for delicate or confined excavation.
Superior operator comfort and minimal cabin vibration.
Short-tail swing — perfect for tight urban or warehouse sites.
Excellent stability for crane or lifting attachments.

Ideal Use CAT 320 vs Komatsu PC200 vs Hitachi ZX210 in Khobar

City expansion, port logistics, and hotel infrastructure.

💡 Hitachi ZX210 is ideal for detailed excavation and controlled performance on urban or industrial sites.

Excavator Price Comparison in Khobar (2025) CAT 320 vs Komatsu PC200 vs Hitachi ZX210 in Khobar

Model	Certified-Used (USD)	New (USD)	Maintenance	Resale Value
CAT 320	85 000 – 120 000	130 000 – 190 000	Medium	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Komatsu PC200	75 000 – 110 000	115 000 – 165 000	Low	⭐⭐⭐⭐
Hitachi ZX210	80 000 – 115 000	120 000 – 170 000	Medium	⭐⭐⭐

💡 CAT commands top resale; Komatsu wins on economy; Hitachi is preferred for control and operator comfort.

Operating Costs for Khobar Projects CAT 320 vs Komatsu PC200 vs Hitachi ZX210 in Khobar

Expense Type	Monthly Average (USD)	Description
Fuel	2 000 – 2 400	200 hrs/month, high-heat operation
Maintenance	800 – 1 200	Filters, fluids, inspections
Undercarriage	25 000 – 40 000	Every 3 000–5 000 hours
Transport	600 – 900	Within Khobar–Dammam–Jubail corridor

💡 Komatsu achieves the lowest operating cost per hour, while CAT 320 offers maximum productivity per liter.

Performance in Key Eastern Province Projects CAT 320 vs Komatsu PC200 vs Hitachi ZX210 in Khobar

Project Type	Recommended Model	Why
Oil & Aramco Sites	CAT 320	Power, grade tech, durability
Port & Logistics	Hitachi ZX210	Control & smooth hydraulics
Housing & Roads	Komatsu PC200	Low fuel burn & easy upkeep
Industrial & Civil Works	CAT 320	Strength & stability
Urban Development	Hitachi ZX210	Compact swing, smooth control

💡 Matching excavator type to project saves up to 20% in total operating cost.

Certified-Used vs New Excavators CAT 320 vs Komatsu PC200 vs Hitachi ZX210 in Khobar

Category	Certified-Used	New
Price	30–40% lower	Premium
Delivery	Immediate	6–10 weeks
Warranty	Partial	Full OEM
Ideal Buyers	Contractors & SMEs	Developers & large firms

💡 Certified-used units from BuyHeavyMachines.com deliver GCC-tested reliability and faster ROI.

Smart Buying Tips for Contractors in Khobar CAT 320 vs Komatsu PC200 vs Hitachi ZX210 in Khobar

1️⃣ Inspect boom, bucket pins, and UC condition.
2️⃣ Ask for service history and oil analysis reports.
3️⃣ Verify ISO 20474 and Saudi MOT compliance.
4️⃣ Choose dealer-inspected or BuyHeavyMachines.com–verified units.
5️⃣ Compare long-term cost per operating hour — not just the upfront price.

💡 Choose based on lifetime efficiency and after-sales network, not initial cost alone.

Internal Resource Links CAT 320 vs Komatsu PC200 vs Hitachi ZX210 in Khobar

(Strong GCC interlinking improves domain authority and Rank Math’s SEO trust signals.)

External Authority References CAT 320 vs Komatsu PC200 vs Hitachi ZX210 in Khobar

(High-DA, non-commercial references boost E-E-A-T and Rank Math SEO score.)

FAQs CAT 320 vs Komatsu PC200 vs Hitachi ZX210 in Khobar

Q: Which excavator performs best in Khobar’s oil projects?
A: The CAT 320, for its strength, technology, and proven uptime under heavy load.

Q: Which machine saves the most fuel?
A: The Komatsu PC200, offering up to 15% lower fuel consumption.

Q: Which is best for confined logistics or city sites?
A: The Hitachi ZX210, with its short-tail swing and smooth hydraulic control.

Q: Are used excavators reliable for Aramco or Jubail projects?
A: Yes — GCC-certified used units meet performance and ISO standards.

Q: Do you deliver across Dammam, Jubail, and Eastern Province?
A: Absolutely — delivery and inspection support are available throughout the region.

cat 320 vs komatsu pc200 vs hitachi zx210 khobar, cat 320 excavator khobar, komatsu pc200 khobar, hitachi zx210 khobar, excavator comparison khobar 2025, used excavator khobar, new excavator khobar, heavy equipment khobar excavators, construction machinery khobar, best excavator saudi arabia